Comments for Tech Law Notes http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com Law Blog for Technologists, powered by www.faithatlaw.com Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Cloudly with a Chance of Computing by Living in the Cloud(s) - Tech Law Notes Tech Law Notes http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2010/02/cloudly-with-a-chance-of-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-351 Living in the Cloud(s) - Tech Law Notes Tech Law Notes Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:39:42 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=368#comment-351 [...] wrote about cloud computing in an earlier post and discussed some of the general pros and cons involved with the idea.  For attorneys, doctors [...] [...] wrote about cloud computing in an earlier post and discussed some of the general pros and cons involved with the idea.  For attorneys, doctors [...]

]]> Comment on EHR & HiTech – More Money for More Health Records by Implementing Your Electronic Health Record System « Faith At Law http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/07/ehr-hitech-more-money-for-more-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-348 Implementing Your Electronic Health Record System « Faith At Law Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:36:42 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=47#comment-348 [...] data exchange, and submission of data of clinical quality measures for patients at the practice. (See my blog for more details here) Reaching these goals goes beyond the mere technical installation of some computer system; [...] [...] data exchange, and submission of data of clinical quality measures for patients at the practice. (See my blog for more details here) Reaching these goals goes beyond the mere technical installation of some computer system; [...]

]]> Comment on Green IT: How Virtualization can Save Earth and Your Butt by Greening IT and Recovering from Systems Failures – A “twofer” at Tech Two Consulting of Maryland http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/07/green-it-how-virtualization-can-save-earth-and-your-butt/comment-page-1/#comment-345 Greening IT and Recovering from Systems Failures – A “twofer” at Tech Two Consulting of Maryland Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:10:37 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=74#comment-345 [...] read the remainder of this posting, check it out on Tech Law Notes, courtesy Tim Faith and Faith at Law, [...] [...] read the remainder of this posting, check it out on Tech Law Notes, courtesy Tim Faith and Faith at Law, [...]

]]> Comment on Meaningful Use Gets A Definition by Meaningful Use Gets a Definition at Health IT 1.0 http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-gets-a-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-344 Meaningful Use Gets a Definition at Health IT 1.0 Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:30:15 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=344#comment-344 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Meaningful Use – Some Thoughts by Thoughts on Meaningful Use at Health IT 1.0 http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-343 Thoughts on Meaningful Use at Health IT 1.0 Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:29:06 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=348#comment-343 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Meaningful Use Gets A Definition by tfaith http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2010/01/meaningful-use-gets-a-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-342 tfaith Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:08:57 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=344#comment-342 Take a look at this article for a helpful table of the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines and measures for eligible professionals: http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-news/the-stimulus-bill-and-meaningful-use-of-qualified-emrs-1031209/ Take a look at this article for a helpful table of the Stage 1 meaningful use guidelines and measures for eligible professionals: http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/medical/medical-news/the-stimulus-bill-and-meaningful-use-of-qualified-emrs-1031209/

]]> Comment on Net Neutrality: An Analysis by Net Neutrality: An Analysis : Tech Law Notes http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/12/net-neutrality-an-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-341 Net Neutrality: An Analysis : Tech Law Notes Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:14:12 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=331#comment-341 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on iPhone Security by iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes | Coder Online http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/12/iphone-security/comment-page-1/#comment-338 iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes | Coder Online Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:02:10 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=325#comment-338 [...] Visit link: iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes [...] [...] Visit link: iPhone Security : Tech Law Notes [...]

]]> Comment on Software Licensing for Businesses by Software Licensing for Businesses : Tech Law Notes Software Rss http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/12/software-licensing-for-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-337 Software Licensing for Businesses : Tech Law Notes Software Rss Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:57:11 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=320#comment-337 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Net Neutrality & Other Misnomers by Stuart Levine http://techlaw.faithatlaw.com/index.php/2009/12/net-neutrality-other-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-335 Stuart Levine Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:05:24 +0000 http://www.2wg.net/lawblog/?p=317#comment-335 Tim--I disagree. In essence, Verizon (through FiOS) and Comcast have a duopoly. They also sell content. In the case of FiOS, it is merely as an agent (i.e., you buy cable through Verizon) and in the case of Comcast both as an agent and, now, as a direct provider (via Comcast's purchase of NBC). Neither have any incentive to provide the Internet service that we need, since such service would destroy their business models which are based on the strangle-hold that they maintain in the market. Assume that everyone has available, at a modest price, very, very, very fast downloads and very, very, very fast uploads. What would happen? The same thing that's happening to newspapers. There would be a great deal of content available and the price we pay for content would fall. Moreover, we'd get really good VOIP phone services with all sorts of enhancements and at a lower price. We need (i) network neutrality and (ii) a government edict to force Verizon and Comcast to offer, for a low price, very, very, very fast internet service, but up and down, with a high quality of service. Tim–I disagree. In essence, Verizon (through FiOS) and Comcast have a duopoly. They also sell content. In the case of FiOS, it is merely as an agent (i.e., you buy cable through Verizon) and in the case of Comcast both as an agent and, now, as a direct provider (via Comcast’s purchase of NBC). Neither have any incentive to provide the Internet service that we need, since such service would destroy their business models which are based on the strangle-hold that they maintain in the market.

Assume that everyone has available, at a modest price, very, very, very fast downloads and very, very, very fast uploads. What would happen?

The same thing that’s happening to newspapers. There would be a great deal of content available and the price we pay for content would fall. Moreover, we’d get really good VOIP phone services with all sorts of enhancements and at a lower price.

We need (i) network neutrality and (ii) a government edict to force Verizon and Comcast to offer, for a low price, very, very, very fast internet service, but up and down, with a high quality of service.

]]>